A top female accountant reviews Alison Harvison Young's math abilities (or lack there of)
Q: (JM) i understand you are a fantastic accountant and very number savvy. What is the maximum hours physically possible for someone who has a day job (8 hours a day, half hour from home) to work a second job each week?
JM: There are 24 hours in a day, sleep 8 of them, that leaves 16; you work 1/2hr(X2) from home and you work 8 hrs, so that leaves 7hrs; you need time to eat and get ready for work, so I would think about 2-1/2 - 3hrs anyway, that would leave about 4hrs/day Mon-Fri, for a part time job on the very max. Sat. and Sun. add another 10hrs/day, approx, so 40hrs/week.
Q: How many weeks in a row can a human being do this consistently?
JM: I think it all depends on the type of work and the physical condition and age of the person doing it. It's not cut and dried. When I was a young woman and in a position where I had to feed my kids and put a roof over our heads, and I was physically able to do it. I did it. It's possible to do it for a long time, if you're physically able.
Q: The work is renovating houses, how long logically do you think an out of shape 35 year old woman do this extra job, 8 hours a day, every day? What would be a realistic low and a realistic maximum?
JM: Renovations such as knocking down walls, ripping up flooring, carpentry? Or painting and decorating???
Q: Building a house from scratch.
JM: Is the building being done after a day job, or is this the day job? It gets dark much earlier now, so that will limit any outdoor work at night. Nothing is impossible, but without any help, she would be fit within a few weeks of doing this kind of labour. Sorry, I just can't be realistic about this one.
Q: Stay on track please we are getting to the point. The day job is office, the other job is building a house from scratch. How many weeks could a woman keep up this work schedule?
JM: okay, I'm going to say, a low guess would be one month to 6 weeks and a high,3-4 months max, that's going straight through,no days off.
Q: The point: Traci "Ti" Maclean under oath in the superior court of ontario :
"submitted a detailed estimate of the number of hours she worked on (Darko Danicic's) property. Ms. McLean broke the estimated hours down as follows:
1999: 2860
2000: 2870
2001: 2776
2002: 1992"
This works out to 7.76 hours per day EVERY DAY for the 3 years and 5.45 per day for the fourth year. Instead of doing this simple math and throwing this complete idiot in jail for perjury as this is beyond any realistic common sense. JUSTICE ALISON HARVISON YOUNG responds by ruling:
"I conclude that her estimates are reasonable and fair." and awards her $90,000 dollars.
Both this ignorant woman and this completely idiotic judge are a SCAR on all hard working woman everywhere.
JM: That's ludicrous , can he appeal?
Q. This and several other blatant perjuries were presented to the court of appeal and the female judge there said:
Mr Danicic's appeal was "wasting court time and was based MERELY ON FACT."
Apparently FACTS do not matter in the high court of ontario.
It is interesting to note that because Harvison Young awarded payment of every hour to this deranged woman, this entitled her to also receive a "cost" award of $228,000.00 in legal fees. Almost 3 times the actual award?
JM: It appears that Mr. Danicic really got the shaft on this one, I'm really sorry for him. We all know that there is something wrong with our justice system. This proves it.
It didn't matter that this woman ordered pizzas to his door, sent taxis at 4:30 in the morning, crank called him and his loved ones day and night, slashed his tires on more than one occasion, defrauded an insurance company out of $100,000.00, Perjured herself under oath dozens of times.
ReplyDeleteNo, the system only hears women no matter the circumstance...